<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Intelligent Positioning: News, articles &amp; updates 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intelligentpositioning.com/blog/tag/illegal-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intelligentpositioning.com/blog</link>
	<description>SEO web development social media consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why does Live search continue to rank dead websites?</title>
		<link>http://www.intelligentpositioning.com/blog/2009/05/why-does-live-search-continue-to-rank-dead-website/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intelligentpositioning.com/blog/2009/05/why-does-live-search-continue-to-rank-dead-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO and Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/?p=688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is it that Live search continues to return a broken link at the top of the rankings, even though the website has not been live since the end of January? Is this the main reason that Live search has a 8.2% market share in the US and Google has a 64.2% market share. So [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/blog/wp-content/uploads/live-search.png" alt="live-search" title="live-search" width="55" height="51" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-738" />Why is it that Live search continues to return a broken link at the top of the rankings, even though the website has not been live since the end of January?  Is this the main reason that <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/05/15/google-again-gains-share-in-core-us-internet-search/">Live search has a 8.2% market share in the US and Google has a 64.2% market share</a>.</p>
<p>So why is Live search still returning an illegal movie website at the top of their rankings for a popular keyword term?</p>
<p><span id="more-688"></span><br />
www.watch-movies.net was apparently closed down and reopened under another domain &#8211; which is a different argument altogether &#8211; and still returns on page one in Live.com for the search term &#8216;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=download+movies+online&amp;go=&amp;form=QBLH&amp;filt=all">Download Movies Online</a>&#8216;, so why is this?  Why does a search engine that wants to compete with Google still returns a broken link to an apparent illegal website within their SERP&#8217;s?  There are many <a href="http://www.blinkbox.com">legitimate Movies</a> available online &#8211; so why is a perfectly normal search query returning poor results?</p>
<p>Take a look at the screenshot below:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-693" title="Snippet of 'watch-movies.net' " src="/blog/wp-content/uploads/picture-13.png" alt="Snippet of 'watch-movies.net' " width="598" height="92" /></p>
<p>This is appearing in your search results today for a highly competitive keyword term.  So why is it still there?  Does Live continue to reward the huge volumes of backlinks pointing to the website?  For some reason the webmaster didn&#8217;t place a 301 redirect on the website &#8211; which of course would have passed over page value and history to the new domain.</p>
<p>Take a look at the performance of the website within Google, Yahoo! and Live over the past five months:</p>
<p><img src="/blog/wp-content/uploads/picture-22.png" alt="Google, Yahoo! &amp; Live rankings for watch-movies.net" title="Google, Yahoo! &amp; Live rankings for watch-movies.net" width="776" height="491" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-694" /></p>
<p>So Yahoo! didn&#8217;t even rank the website highly in the first place, Google did but immediately the ranking dropped once the content was removed (even though there were a vast number of backlinks pointing to the website) and then there is Live, which continues to rank a website highly (amidst some fluctuations it has to be said) that hasn&#8217;t be live for over four months&#8230;&#8230;and people wonder why Google has such a stronghold online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intelligentpositioning.com/blog/2009/05/why-does-live-search-continue-to-rank-dead-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

